Score your Pre-Startup Safety Review readiness across 12 criteria in three categories. Identifies specific gaps before chemical introduction — with a printable gap report for your project record.
29 CFR 1910.119(i)12 Assessment Criteria3 CategoriesPrintable Gap Report
Design
—
Documentation
—
People
—
Design Conformance
Verifies that the facility as built matches the design basis that the PHA was conducted against — and that safety-critical systems are verified functional.
Design · 1 of 4
Construction punch list items have been formally closed, signed off, and outstanding items have documented risk acceptance with completion commitments.
Basis: 29 CFR 1910.119(i)(1) — construction and equipment in accordance with design specifications
Design · 2 of 4
All safety-critical instruments — SIS trips, interlocks, pressure safety valves, rupture disks — have been functionally tested with setpoints confirmed against the final SIL study and instrument index.
Relief device sizing has been verified against final process conditions as built, and backpressure calculations reflect the as-built vent header configuration — including any field deviations during construction.
Basis: API 520/521 — relief device adequacy for covered processes
Design · 4 of 4
P&IDs reflect as-built conditions. All field deviations and construction MOC packages are incorporated into the Process Safety Information package. The PSI is accurate as of startup day.
Basis: 29 CFR 1910.119(d) — Process Safety Information currency
Documentation Readiness
Confirms that written procedures, PHA recommendations, and MOC packages are complete, accurate, and reflected in the current facility configuration.
Documentation · 1 of 4
Startup, normal operation, emergency shutdown, and emergency response procedures are written, field-validated against the as-built equipment, and accepted by the operating team — not just reviewed by engineering.
Basis: 29 CFR 1910.119(i)(2) — safety, operating, maintenance, and emergency procedures in place and adequate
Documentation · 2 of 4
The site Emergency Response Plan is facility-specific — covers the actual chemicals present, references the current facility configuration, and includes notification protocols for local emergency responders.
Basis: 29 CFR 1910.119(n) — Emergency Planning and Response
Documentation · 3 of 4
All HAZOP/PHA action items are classified (Class 1/2/3). Class 1 items are closed with documented evidence. Open items have formal risk acceptance with scheduled completion dates signed by appropriate authority.
Basis: 29 CFR 1910.119(i)(3) — PHA recommendations resolved or documented
Documentation · 4 of 4
All Management of Change packages opened during construction and commissioning are formally closed. Updated documentation — revised drawings, procedures, training records — is attached to each closed MOC package.
Basis: 29 CFR 1910.119(i)(4) — MOC requirements have been met
People & Operations Readiness
Confirms that the operating team has the training, authority, and operational infrastructure to run the facility safely from Day 1.
People · 1 of 4
All operating personnel have task-specific qualification records documenting demonstrated competency — not just training attendance. Records include the procedure revision trained against and the qualification result.
Basis: 29 CFR 1910.119(i)(5) — training of each employee involved in operating has been completed
People · 2 of 4
At minimum one tabletop emergency scenario has been conducted with the operating crew, specific to this facility's credible emergencies — not a generic fire response drill.
Basis: 29 CFR 1910.119(n) — Emergency Response Plan implementation
People · 3 of 4
Authority boundaries between operations and on-site contractors are documented. Permit-to-work coverage is defined and in force. Communication protocols between contractor supervision and operations are established.
Basis: 29 CFR 1910.119(h) — Contractor Safety element
People · 4 of 4
Maintenance procedures exist for all safety-critical equipment. Qualified maintenance technicians are available. Critical spare parts are on hand per the MI program — especially for SIS components with defined proof test intervals.
Basis: 29 CFR 1910.119(j) — Mechanical Integrity element
Overall PSSR Readiness
—
—
—
Design Conformance
—
Documentation
—
People & Operations
—
Gap Analysis
Items rated below "Complete & Verified" — prioritized by score
Ready for an independent PSSR review?
We conduct independent PSSR verification for new facilities and significant modifications — checking what your team may have normalized, and confirming readiness before chemical introduction.